Podcast Episode: Sermon: Proper 21 RCL A1 – “Massah and Meribah”

Pip: There's a sermon on this week's feed that opens with a joke about Joan of Arc — and somehow lands in the middle of the Sinai desert without losing anyone. Fr. John has been busy.

Mara: This episode covers one sermon — but it moves through a lot of territory: wilderness thirst, reasonable expectations, a parable about a vineyard, and what the Church is actually for. Let's start with the desert.

Sermon: Proper 21 RCL A1 — Massah and Meribah

Pip: The sermon opens with a question the Israelites asked at Rephidim — "Is the Lord among us or not?" — and it's framed not as ancient faithlessness but as something recognizable. The tension is between reasonable expectation and a wasteland where nothing arrives.

Mara: The setup matters here. The Israelites weren't wandering blindly — they were traveling oasis to oasis, as commanded. The sermon notes, "The whole congregation of the Israelites journeyed by stages, as the Lord commanded." They did what they were told, and they arrived somewhere dry.

Pip: Which is the real sting of the story. This wasn't recklessness punished — it was faithfulness that hit a wall. You followed the route, and the oasis was empty.

Mara: And the sermon is careful not to let the congregation feel superior to the Israelites. It points out that these are the same people who witnessed the ten plagues, the parting of the sea, the cloud by day and fire by night — and roughly forty-five days later, they're questioning whether God is present at all. The place gets renamed: Massah and Meribah, testing and quarreling.

Pip: Right — and the sermon doesn't leave it as a cautionary tale about ancient ingratitude. It pivots to something harder.

Mara: Much harder. It asks whether each listener has a place in their own life that started as Rephidim — a legitimate destination — and became Massah and Meribah. The sermon lists it plainly: "The prayer isn't answered, the relationship cracks, the sickness persists… there is no water."

Pip: That's where the parable of the two sons comes in, and it's doing more work than it might seem.

Mara: The sermon focuses on the first son — the one who says no and then goes anyway. Nothing changes externally; there's still no water. What changes is the son. And the sermon offers two reasons he goes back: obedience, and relationship. It calls obedience "a very distant second."

Pip: The primary reason is that the son knows the father has always been faithful — so he trusts the father has reasons, even when the vineyard is brutal and the water hasn't come.

Mara: The sermon closes with something specific about what the Church can and cannot do. It doesn't promise a timeline. It says, "I can sit with you in Rephidim. When you cannot remember what God has done, I can remember it for you. When you cannot pray, I can pray for you." The community itself becomes the evidence that God is present.

Pip: Which is a quieter answer than most people want — but probably the only honest one available.


Mara: The through-line here is expectation — what we're owed, what we trust, and what we do when the oasis is dry.

Pip: Next time, bring water. Or at least someone who remembers where the last spring was.

What's on your mind?