If you receive email notifications, please note that some images did not properly load from the original post. You can visit the blog HERE to view.
Sorry about that!

The Rev. Dr. John Toles
If you receive email notifications, please note that some images did not properly load from the original post. You can visit the blog HERE to view.
Sorry about that!
Pip: There's a sermon on this week's feed that opens with a joke about Joan of Arc — and somehow lands in the middle of the Sinai desert without losing anyone. Fr. John has been busy.
Mara: This episode covers one sermon — but it moves through a lot of territory: wilderness thirst, reasonable expectations, a parable about a vineyard, and what the Church is actually for. Let's start with the desert.
Pip: The sermon opens with a question the Israelites asked at Rephidim — "Is the Lord among us or not?" — and it's framed not as ancient faithlessness but as something recognizable. The tension is between reasonable expectation and a wasteland where nothing arrives.
Mara: The setup matters here. The Israelites weren't wandering blindly — they were traveling oasis to oasis, as commanded. The sermon notes, "The whole congregation of the Israelites journeyed by stages, as the Lord commanded." They did what they were told, and they arrived somewhere dry.
Pip: Which is the real sting of the story. This wasn't recklessness punished — it was faithfulness that hit a wall. You followed the route, and the oasis was empty.
Mara: And the sermon is careful not to let the congregation feel superior to the Israelites. It points out that these are the same people who witnessed the ten plagues, the parting of the sea, the cloud by day and fire by night — and roughly forty-five days later, they're questioning whether God is present at all. The place gets renamed: Massah and Meribah, testing and quarreling.
Pip: Right — and the sermon doesn't leave it as a cautionary tale about ancient ingratitude. It pivots to something harder.
Mara: Much harder. It asks whether each listener has a place in their own life that started as Rephidim — a legitimate destination — and became Massah and Meribah. The sermon lists it plainly: "The prayer isn't answered, the relationship cracks, the sickness persists… there is no water."
Pip: That's where the parable of the two sons comes in, and it's doing more work than it might seem.
Mara: The sermon focuses on the first son — the one who says no and then goes anyway. Nothing changes externally; there's still no water. What changes is the son. And the sermon offers two reasons he goes back: obedience, and relationship. It calls obedience "a very distant second."
Pip: The primary reason is that the son knows the father has always been faithful — so he trusts the father has reasons, even when the vineyard is brutal and the water hasn't come.
Mara: The sermon closes with something specific about what the Church can and cannot do. It doesn't promise a timeline. It says, "I can sit with you in Rephidim. When you cannot remember what God has done, I can remember it for you. When you cannot pray, I can pray for you." The community itself becomes the evidence that God is present.
Pip: Which is a quieter answer than most people want — but probably the only honest one available.
Mara: The through-line here is expectation — what we're owed, what we trust, and what we do when the oasis is dry.
Pip: Next time, bring water. Or at least someone who remembers where the last spring was.
Pip: Fire-breathing dragons, a martyrdom at the altar, and a painter who hid himself in the scene running away — Fr. John has been busy.
Mara: This episode follows a single sermon preached on the Feast of St. Matthew, tracing the saint's legend from Jerusalem to Ethiopia, and ending with a question about what it means to keep looking back at the Gospel even as we walk away from it.
Pip: Let's start with the legend itself, and what it asks of us.
Mara: The sermon opens in apocryphal territory — not the canonical Gospels but the Acts of the Holy Apostle Thomas, where the apostles divide up the known world before scattering to evangelize it.
Pip: The verbatim passage sets the scene directly: "we the apostles were all in Jerusalem — Simon called Peter, and Andrew his brother; James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother; Philip and Bartholomew; Thomas, and Matthew the tax-gatherer… and we portioned out the regions of the world, in order that each one of us might go into the region that fell to him."
Mara: Matthew's region, according to Jacobus de Voragine's Golden Legend, is Ethiopia — where he settles with the very eunuch Philip had baptized on the road to Gaza, and spends thirty-three years converting the country.
Pip: Dragons lay down at his feet. A king's son rises from the dead. The king announces, quote, "Come and see God in the likeness of a man" — and Matthew redirects all the gold toward building a church. Quite the ministry.
Mara: The sermon doesn't stop at the legend. It moves to Caravaggio's Martyrdom of Saint Matthew in Rome, where the saint lies on the altar steps, hand raised — not to ward off the executioner's blow, but to receive a palm branch from an angel above.
Pip: And then the sermon finds its real subject: a second face in the painting. Just behind the executioner's shoulder, Caravaggio painted himself — watching the scene and walking away from it.
Mara: The sermon asks what that figure means for the rest of us. The words are plain: "We hear the Gospel. We know what Christ asks of us… And sometimes we do. But sometimes we turn away. Sometimes the demands of the Gospel are more than we want to bear."
Pip: But the man is still looking back. That's the hinge the whole sermon turns on.
Mara: Right — and the sermon holds that tension without resolving it cheaply. The question it leaves is not whether we'd have the courage to die as Matthew did, but whether we have the courage to turn around while we're still alive.
Pip: The palm branch is waiting. The painting says the journey isn't over yet.
Mara: A saint's legend, a Caravaggio self-portrait, and a question about where we place ourselves in the scene.
Pip: Still looking back. Which, apparently, is where grace begins.
Pip: Star Wars, Pharaoh, a donkey with delusions of grandeur — Fr. John is covering a lot of ground this week at Candle in a Cave.
Mara: The sermon for Proper 19 pulls together the Exodus story, the parable of the unforgiving servant, and a question that runs through all of it: what are you actually building with what God has given you?
Pip: Let's get into it.
Mara: The sermon opens with a sweep through history — every great empire, from the British to the Mongol to the Babylonian, eventually collapses. That pattern sets up the Exodus reading, where Pharaoh insists the Nile is his own making.
Pip: And the sermon lands the line that becomes the sermon's spine. After the Israelites cross the Red Sea and receive Egyptian gold as a parting gift from God, they melt it into a golden calf — and the sermon reads that act as Pharaoh's logic recycled: "My Nile is my own; I made it for myself."
Mara: That phrase does the heavy lifting. The Israelites were liberated, given a gift, and then used the gift to rebuild the very thing they escaped — their own version of Egypt, their own small empire.
Pip: Which is where the parable of the unforgiving servant walks in and makes the same point at human scale. The king forgives an impossible debt — the sea parts, the servant walks through free — and then the servant immediately shakes down a colleague for pocket change.
Mara: The sermon draws the parallel directly: "The servant took the gift of mercy and, in his arrogance, began building his own little empire." Liberation received, liberation refused to others.
Pip: And then there is the donkey. Decorated with garlands to carry a sacred icon, he stops mid-procession and brays at the crowd, convinced the adoration is for him. The man leading him swats him and says, "The honor is not meant for you but for the image you are carrying."
Mara: That fable lands the sermon's practical point. The gifts — wealth, education, position, talent — are not the problem. The sermon is clear: "The gold was never the problem. Possessing the gold was never the problem. The question was what they built with it."
Pip: Wealth can build an empire or serve the Kingdom. Same gold, entirely different structure.
Mara: Saint James frames it as the law of liberty — freedom from sin that teaches liberated people how to live, and Saint Peter adds: "use it to serve one another, as good stewards of God's varied grace… in order that in everything God may be glorified through Jesus Christ."
Pip: Every empire falls. The sermon closes on that contrast — every empire we build eventually collapses, and God's Kingdom endures forever — and asks why anyone would choose the perishable project.
Mara: The closing prayer puts it plainly: serve without counting the cost, labor without seeking rest, spend yourself for glory that belongs to someone else entirely.
Pip: Pharaoh, a servant, and a self-important donkey — same story, different costumes.
Mara: The question underneath all of it stays simple: the gift is in your hands. What are you building with it?
Pip: There's a sermon on Candle in a Cave that opens with Shakespeare, detours through a shrew the size of a penny, and ends with a butcher knife in a teenager's hand — and somehow it's all about forgiveness.
Mara: Fr. John's recent writing takes us into the hard territory of reconciliation — what the Gospel actually asks of us when someone genuinely wrongs us, and why the answer isn't what we'd prefer.
Pip: Let's start with the sermon itself.
Pip: The Gospel passage at the center of this sermon sounds, at first read, like permission — Jesus telling us to go confront the person who wronged us. The question the sermon presses on is what motivation we're actually supposed to bring to that confrontation.
Mara: The setup begins with Katherine from The Taming of the Shrew — a character whose fury is her defining feature. The sermon draws a line from her to what it calls the grouch and the shrew in all of us, and then lands here: "It's as if Jesus is giving us permission to be the grouch or the shrew we know we have every right to be."
Pip: Which is a fair read of the text — until it isn't.
Mara: Right, and that's exactly the pivot the sermon makes. The cockroach exercise is where it gets concrete. A dozen teenagers, a paper box with a cockroach image taped to the lid, and a butcher knife. They shred the cockroach completely — and underneath is an image of Jesus, also shredded. The outrage is immediate.
Pip: Probably not the pastoral risk assessment form they teach in seminary, but the lesson lands.
Mara: The sermon draws the theological line directly from that image: "Whatever you do to them, you do to Jesus." And it holds that against the Gospel's one sentence that's easy to skip past.
Mara: That sentence is: "If the member listens to you, you have regained that one." The sermon reads that as the whole point — the motivation isn't vengeance, it's reconciliation. Paul's letter to the Romans backs it up: "Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, 'Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.'"
Pip: So the upshot is that the passage isn't a license to build a team and stock up on ammunition — it's a call to want the other person back.
Mara: And the sermon is careful about what reconciliation doesn't require. It doesn't mean forgetting, pretending you weren't hurt, or allowing the offender back into your life. What it does mean, as the sermon puts it, is you release the desire to go stab cockroaches — you refuse to let someone else's sin dictate who you become.
Pip: The closing image is the early martyrs who had no great words, just a simple reply when told to renounce their faith or die.
Mara: "I am a Christian." The sermon offers that as the thing to say to yourself in the moment anger tips toward vengeance — not a denial of the harm, but a refusal to be ruled by it.
Pip: And the final line reframes the familiar "where two or three are gathered" — not a formula for a small meeting, but a description of a reconciled community.
Mara: The through-line here is that reconciliation is the shape of Jesus' entire ministry — and the sermon asks whether we're willing to let that be the shape of ours.
Pip: Even when the cockroach really had it coming. More from Candle in a Cave next time.
Pip: There's a sermon on Candle in a Cave that opens with a medical transcription disaster and lands, somehow, on the fiery furnace of Daniel. Fr. John has range.
Mara: This episode follows that sermon through three interlocking figures — Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, Moses at the burning bush, and Jesus heading toward Jerusalem — all circling the same question about faith under pressure.
Pip: Let's get into the furnace.
—
Mara: The sermon sets up a central tension right away: what does faith actually look like when the outcome is genuinely uncertain — when God might save you, or might not?
Pip: And the sermon's answer comes straight from Daniel, chapter three. The setup is worth naming: three Jewish men in Nebuchadnezzar's court, condemned for refusing to worship a golden statue, standing in front of a king who asks who could possibly save them now.
Mara: The text gives their reply directly: "Our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the burning fiery furnace, and he will deliver us out of your hand, O king. But if not, be it known to you, O king, that we will not serve your gods or worship the golden image that you have set up."
Pip: "But if not." That's the hinge. They're not bargaining with God, and they're not promising themselves a rescue. They're saying the furnace does not get to decide who they are.
Mara: Right — and the sermon makes the stakes plain: their faith was not contingent on the outcome. It was, as the text puts it, "simply in God and His divine providence, without qualification."
Pip: Which is where Moses comes in, and this is a sharp move. God tells Moses to walk back into Egypt — back into the place he fled, as a wanted man, to confront Pharaoh. God doesn't promise it will be easy. The sermon frames it plainly: "I am sending you into the furnace, and I will be with you."
Mara: That phrase — "I will be with you" — is the thread connecting all three figures. The sermon notes that God never spoke those words directly to Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego. But Nebuchadnezzar's own testimony proved them true: a fourth figure, unbound, walking in the fire beside them.
Pip: And then there's Peter, flinching when Jesus announces he's headed to Jerusalem to suffer and die. A very human reaction. The sermon doesn't mock him for it.
Mara: It doesn't. The sermon reads Jesus's rebuke as clarification, not condemnation — Jesus already knows the Father is with him, and he's telling Peter: follow me through the furnace, because I will be with you in yours.
Pip: The sermon ends with a kind of stripped-down catechism. Standing in front of the furnace, all the complicated answers fall away. What's left? "I believe in one God, the Father Almighty." Not an explanation. Not a guarantee. Just that.
Mara: The closing line lands it: "I believe does mean we are not walking into the furnace alone."
—
Pip: Faith that holds without a promised outcome — that's a harder ask than most furnace stories let on.
Mara: It is. And that question of what remains when the answers run out seems like territory worth returning to.
Pip: What if the whole arc of history turns on someone you never heard of — a midwife, a sister watching from the reeds, a princess who ignored her father's orders?
Mara: That's the territory Fr. John is working in this week — small actors, enormous consequences, and what Paul's letter to the Romans has to say about how gifts get distributed across a body. Let's start with the sermon itself.
Pip: The sermon opens with a provocation: history's biggest disasters and turning points may hinge on actions so small the people taking them had no idea what they were doing. The question underneath the whole piece is who actually carries the work forward when the famous figure is still in a basket.
Mara: The sermon sets that up early with the Exodus story, and the framing lands here: "The story of Exodus is not just the story of Moses. Instead, it is the story of God and the individuals He endowed with specific gifts so that His will might be accomplished in their lives and in the world."
Pip: And Moses, in this telling, is almost beside the point for this particular passage. He rides in a basket, eats, sleeps — the sermon is blunt about it. Four things. Everyone else is doing the actual work.
Mara: The sermon traces four figures who each carry a piece of that work. The midwives Shiphrah and Puah are summoned by Pharaoh to kill male Hebrew newborns — professionals, the sermon notes, important members of the community — and they simply refuse, fearing God more than Pharaoh.
Pip: There's a quiet observation buried in there worth pulling out: the sermon notes that the Hebrew word for the basket Jochebed builds is tevah — the same word used for Noah's ark. She's not just hiding a baby. She's building an ark.
Mara: Right, and then Miriam watches where the ark goes, and Pharaoh's daughter — the one person in the story with every advantage — sees a Hebrew child and chooses pity over policy.
Pip: Which is where Paul comes in, and the sermon earns the connection. The Romans passage lists gifts: prophecy, ministry, teaching, exhortation, generosity, leadership, compassion. The sermon points out the list is short but the categories are broad — broad enough to hold midwives, mothers, watchers, and wealthy women with the courage to contradict their fathers.
Mara: The sermon then pivots to Peter's confession, and the move is interesting. Jesus asks Peter who he says Jesus is — and the sermon suggests turning that question around: ask Jesus who he says you are. The answer, it argues, is usually already visible in what you can already do.
Pip: God, the sermon says, is not going to make a brain surgeon into a carpenter. He takes what's already there.
Mara: The closing line pulls it together: "If we allow it, God will take our natural gifts and give us opportunities to use them for holy purposes."
Pip: Small actions. Tremendous results. The reeds are still there if you know where to look.
Mara: The thread running through all of it is that the people history skips over are often the ones holding the story together.
Pip: Ask who you are. Open your eyes. Apparently the answer is already in the water.
Pip: There's a sermon at Candle in a Cave that opens with a man proposing marriage — and his girlfriend immediately asking about someone else. Which, honestly, is a better setup for a theology lesson than most theology lessons get.
Mara: Fr. John uses that story as a way into something the sermon calls "the story of the heart" — what God actually finds when he looks past the surface performance of faith. Let's start there.
Pip: The question this sermon is really asking is whether religious observance and genuine faith are the same thing — and the answer, it turns out, is that God is not fooled by the difference.
Mara: The sermon anchors that claim in Psalm 139, with the opening line setting the frame: "O Lord, you have searched me and known me! You know when I sit down and when I rise up; you discern my thoughts from afar."
Pip: So the premise is that the search is already happening, whether you invited it or not. The real question the sermon puts to the listener is whether you actually want God to find what's there.
Mara: And the honest answer the sermon gives is: not always. The words are, "Do I really want God to do that? I mean, I know my heart, and sometimes… it's best left hidden."
Pip: That's a braver thing to say from a pulpit than most people manage.
Mara: The sermon then traces the problem backward through Isaiah, where God tells Israel he is weary of their feasts and offerings — "your hands are full of blood" — while they go through every outward motion correctly. The external performance is intact; the interior is the problem.
Mara: Jesus makes the same move in Matthew 15, quoting Isaiah directly: "This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me; in vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men."
Pip: And then the sermon does something structurally interesting — it treats the very next scene, the Canaanite woman, not as a change of subject but as the proof of the lesson.
Mara: Right. The disciples tell Jesus to send the woman away. What comes out of their mouths, the sermon says, is "prejudice, contempt, judgment, anger, impatience." The woman, by contrast, keeps pressing — "Lord, help me" — and Jesus names what he finds: "Great is your faith."
Pip: The disciples followed every tradition. She broke every boundary just by being there. And she's the one who gets the blessing.
Mara: The sermon closes by returning to Psalm 139 as an invitation and a request together — not just "search me," but "if you find anything amiss, lead me out of it and into your ways." It calls that a good prayer, and also, honestly, a frightening one.
Pip: The sermon's final question — "what is the story of your heart?" — is one of those that doesn't let you off the hook by answering it quickly.
Mara: And it lands harder because the sermon already admitted the honest answer isn't always flattering. More from Candle in a Cave next time.
Pip: A three-year-old invoking the name of Jesus to score twenty-three boxes of chocolate chip cookies — honestly, that is the most theologically efficient prayer in recorded history.
Mara: That story opens a sermon by Fr. John, and it turns out to be the perfect door into something much larger: what prayer actually does when God already has a plan.
Pip: Right — and that tension between providence and petition is exactly where this episode lives. Let's get into it.
Mara: The central question here is one that anyone who has prayed and waited and heard nothing will recognize: if God has a wise, loving plan already in motion, what is the point of asking?
Pip: The sermon lands its answer through Jacob — a man who wrestled God at the Jabbok River and refused to let go. Here is the line that frames everything: "Jacob prayed, 'Bless me,' and the Lord replied, 'What you are asking is good, but it is too small.'"
Mara: That reframe is the hinge of the whole argument. Jacob got his blessing — but it arrived as a dislocated hip, a new name, and a lineage that eventually produced Jesus of Nazareth. The prayer was answered; it just expanded far beyond what Jacob could have conceived.
Pip: So the sermon is not really arguing that God ignores us. It is arguing that our requests are structurally too small for what God is doing.
Mara: Exactly, and three reasons for prayer follow from that. The first two are fairly direct: Jesus commands it, and prayer enlarges the soul to receive more of God — the sermon uses the image of a teaspoon versus a five-gallon bucket both dipped in the ocean. Neither empties the ocean; one simply holds more.
Pip: The third reason is the one with some weight to it.
Mara: It is. The sermon draws on Paul's letter to the Corinthians: "We are God's fellow workers. You are God's field, God's building." The claim is that prayer is not just petition — it is participation. God wants us asking so we can be woven into the work itself.
Pip: Which reframes the unanswered prayer entirely. You are not being ignored; you are being incorporated.
Mara: And when we do not know what to ask for, Paul's words from Romans carry the load: "The Spirit himself intercedes for us with groanings too deep for words." Our feeble attempts, the sermon says, are taken and perfected.
Pip: Twenty-three boxes of cookies, or a busted hip — either way, you are not praying into a void.
Mara: The through-line is that providence and prayer are not in competition — prayer is how we become part of the story rather than just recipients of it.
Pip: Jacob limped away from that riverbank with everything he asked for and more than he bargained for. That seems about right. More next time.